LIVELIHOOD ANALYSIS OF SMALLHOLDER IRRIGATION FARMERS IN NIGERIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51406/jagse.v14i1.1215Keywords:
Crop yield, Irrigation, livelihood, productivity, water management.Abstract
The study assessed the smallholder irrigation farmers’ welfare by examining their irrigation practices and factor affecting their production outputs in Nigeria. Cross sectional survey was conducted and primary data were collected from 198 smallholder farmers across selected three major agro-ecological zones using a multistage sampling technique. The results revealed thatthe highest proportion of farmers using motor pump with groundwater (71%) and surface water (62%) irrigation system for farming live in houses made of cement and bricks compared to 59.1% for farmers who practice rainfed agriculture. About 81.5% of the tube wells are found among the motor pump irrigators, 30% respondents have hand dug wells. The percentage of farmers with motor pump and associated piping accessories ranges from 30% among gravity flow irrigators to 70% and 80% among surface and groundwater irrigators respectively. The analysis of factors affecting farmers productivity suggest that in order to increase productivity, the manual pump users, should be discouraged from excessiveuse of fertilizer and large farm size while access to other inputs such as agrochemicals, education, association with social groups, capital formation should be strengthened. The motor pump users require large farm size to further increase their output level, while the gravity flow irrigators need to join farmers association. Furthermore, extension services across the agro-ecological zones should be resuscitated in order to increase agricultural productivity.
Â
References
Dougherty, T.C., Hall, A.W. 1995. Environmental impact assessment of irrigation and drainage projects. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 53. ISBN 92-5-103731-0. Online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/v8350e/v8350e00.htm
FAO, 2008. Climate Change, energy and food security: High level conference on food security - the challenges of climate change and bioenergy, Rome 3 – 5 June, 2008.
Falkenmark, M. 1997. Meeting water requirements of an expanding world population. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 352 (1356): 929-936.
Frenken, K. 2005. "Irrigation in Africa in figures–AQUASTAT Survey – 2005" (PDF). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ISBN 92-5-105414-2. ftp://ftp.fao.org/agl/aglw/docs/wr29_eng.pdf. Retrieved 2007-03-14.
Viala, E. 2008. Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 22 (1): 127-129.
Picazo-Tadeo, A. J. and E. Reig-MartÃnez (2005). Calculating shadow wages for family labor in agriculture: An analysis for Spanish citrus fruit farms. Cahiers d’économie et sociologie rurales, 75:5-21
Smith, L.E.D. 2007, Assessment of the contribution of irrigation to poverty reduction and sustainable livelihoods. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 20 (2): 243-257.
Snyder, R. L., Melo-Abreu, J. P. 2005. "Frost protection: fundamentals, practice, and economics – Volume 1" (PDF). Food and Agriculture Organization of the UnitedNations. ISSN: 1684- 8241.. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/008/y7223e/y7223e00.pdf.
Sullivan, C.A., Meigh, J.R., Giacomello, A.M. 2003. The Water Poverty Index: Development and application at the community scale. Natural Resources Forum, 27:189-199.Â
Williams, J. F.; S. R. Roberts, J. E. Hill, S. C. Scardaci, G. Tibbits. 1990. "Managing Water for Weed Control in Rice". California Agriculture, 44 (5): 7-10.
World health organization (WHO), 1983. Environmental health impact assessment of irrigated Agriculture. Geneva, Switzerland.
Yu B., Zhu T., Breisinger C., Manhhai N. 2010. Â Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Policy Options for Adaptation: the Case of Viet Nam. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) (available at: http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/ifpridp01015.pdf).
