COMPARING THE OPTIMAL ALLOCATION IN STRATIFIED AND POST-STRATIFIED SAMPLING USING MULTI-ITEMS

Authors

  • F S APANTAKU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51406/jnset.v13i1.1471

Keywords:

Optimum allocation, stratified sampling, post stratified sampling, multi-items, optimization

Abstract

Usually in sample surveys more than one population characteristics are estimated (multi-item). These characteristics may be of conflicting nature. Optimal allocation using a stratified random sample solves the statistical problem that may be found with proportional allocation, by ensuring that enough respondents are studied in each segment to provide the highest level of accuracy for the overall results. The study compared optimum allocation in stratified and post stratified sampling using multi-items and determined the variations of the components of the multi-items in the proposed model. The idea of optimum allocation based on the multi-items was approached using a linear programming problem that minimizes the covariance of the stratified variable subject to a fixed cost. The covariance matrix was defined based on the four socio-economic characteristics of 400 heads of household in Abeokuta South and Ijebu North Local Government Areas of Ogun State, Nigeria. The characteristics were occupation, income, household size and educational level. The data from the survey was transformed for each of the four characteristics. The estimates used in the computation were calculated using statistical analysis software Splus. From the analysis, it was seen that for both Abeokuta and Ijebu data sets, the variance based on the four characteristics as multivariate is less than that of the variables when considered as a univariate. From the results, it was seen that there was no difference in the percentage of the total variance accounted for by the different components from the merged sample when compared with the individual sample.

References

Arthanari, T.S., Dodge, Y. 1981. Mathematical programming on statistics. A Wiley-Interscience, Publication, John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Bankier, M. D. 1996. Estimators based on several stratified samples with applications to multiple frame survey. Journal of American Stat. Assoc. 81: 1074 «¤?? 1079.

Bethel, F. 1989. Bayes and minimax prediction in finite population. Journal of Statistical Planning, 60, 127 «¤?? 135.

Chatterjee, S. 1972. A study of optimal allocation in multivariate stratified surveys. Skand Akt. 73, 55«¤?? 57.

Cheang, C. 2011. Sampling strategies and their advantages and disadvantages. http://www.2.hawaii.edu/~cheang/Sampling%20Strategies%20Advantages%20and%20Disadvantages.htm (Accessed March 5, 2011).

Cochran, W. G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. (3rd Edition), New York, Wiley.

Diaz-Garcia, J.A and Ramos-Quiroga, R. 2011. Multivariate Stratified Sampling by Stochastic Multi Objective Optimization. Xiv: 1106.0773VI. Statistical Methodology. XIV, 1116-1123.

Diaz-Garcia, J. A., Cortez, L. U. 2008. Multivariate sampling techniques in science. Communicacion Technica: Communicaciones Del CIMAT. 8 (9), 76-83.

Diaz-Garcia, J. A., Cortez, L. U. 2006. Optimum allocation in multivariate stratified sampling: multi-objective programming. Communicacion Technica: Communicaciones Del CIMAT. 6(7), 28-33.

Diaz-Garcia, J.A., Cortez, L. U. 2008. Multi-objective optimisation for optimum allocation in multivariate stratified sampling. Survey Methodology, Vol. 34, No 2, 215-222.

Hartley, H. O. 1962. Multiple frame surveys: Proceeding of the social statistics section of American Statistical Association, 205 «¤?? 215.

Hartley, H. O. 1964. A new estimation theory for sampling surveys. Biometrics, 55, 545 «¤?? 557.

Jolliffe, I.T. 1986. Principal Component Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer Publishers.

Khan, M.G.M., Ahsan, M.J. 2003. A note on Optimum Allocation in Multivariate Stratified Sampling. South Pacific Journal Natural Science, 21, 91-95.

Kish, L. 1965. Survey sampling. New York, Wiley.

Kokan, A.R and Khan, S.U., 1967. Optimum allocation in mutivariate surveys. An analytical solution. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 29, 115-125.

Kolenikov, S. 2010. Re: about multi-stage stratified sampling designing. http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2010-04/msg01453.html Accessed February 27, 2011).

Lumley, T. 2004. Analysis of complex survey samples. Department of Biostatistics. University of Washington Press.

Miettinen, K. M. 1999. Non linear multi-objective optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

Pirzada, S., Maqbool, S. 2003. Optimal Allocation in Multivariate sampling Through Chebyshev«¤??s Approximation. Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Science Society, 2, (26), 221 «¤?? 230.

Saxens, J., Narain, M. U., Srivastava, S. 1986. The maximum likelihood method for non-response in Surveys. Survey Methodology. 12, 50 «¤?? 62.

Sethna, B. N., Groeneveld, L. 1984. Research Methods in Marketing and Management. Tata, Mcgraw-Hill, publishing, New-Delhi.

Steuer, R.E. 1986. Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, Computation and applications. John Wiley, New York.

Sukhatme, P.V, Sukhatme, B.V, Sukhatme, S., Asok, C. 1984. Sampling Theory of Survey with Applications. 3rd Edition. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

Winship, C., Radbill, L. 1994. Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 23, (2), 230 «¤?? 257

Downloads

Published

2016-03-07

Issue

Section

Articles