CONVERSATIONAL DISCOURSE AND STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE IN BASIC SCIENCE CLASSROOM IN SELECTED SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN ABEOKUTA NORTH LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, OGUN STATE

Authors

  • A. IFEANYI Communication and Language Studies Programme, Institute of Communication and General Studies, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria
  • T. E. POPOOLA Communication and Language Studies Programme,
  • H. A. BODUNDE Communication and Language Studies Programme,

Keywords:

Conversational analysis; discourse analysis; classroom discourse; language competence.

Abstract

Learning a language in the classroom is a consequence of the exposure of the learner to the linguistic environment manifested in the interaction between the participants in that context. This study examined the conversational discourse of the science classroom in urban and rural schools, private and public schools and the relationship between classroom discourse and students’ performance. Two hundred students were randomly selected from four schools, (2 private and 2 public), two each from urban and rural areas, in Abeokuta North Local Government Area of Ogun State Nigeria. The data gathering tools included a tape-recorder, researchers’ observation notes and a performance test. Data were analysed using bar charts, percentages and graphs. Urban schools (86.0%) outperformed rural schools (62.0%) in terms of students’ achievement. Private schools, both urban (86.0%) and rural (56.0%), performed better than the public schools (urban (62%) vs rural (52%). Rural classrooms showed higher rate of code-mixing (65%) and switching (22%) in conversational discource, whereas, urban schools had minimal code-mixing (0.13%). Based on these findings, teachers in rural regions should limit usage of code-mixing and switching to increase students’ comprehension. Public schools should encourage students’ participation in class sessions and teachers should ensure that teachings are aligned with the English language medium of assessment. Workshops and seminars on successful interactive classroom communication should be held to assist teachers improve their instructional techniques.

Author Biographies

A. IFEANYI, Communication and Language Studies Programme, Institute of Communication and General Studies, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria

Communication and Language Studies Programme, Institute of Communication and General Studies, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria

 

T. E. POPOOLA, Communication and Language Studies Programme,

Communication and Language Studies Programme, Institute of Communication and General Studies, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria

 

H. A. BODUNDE, Communication and Language Studies Programme,

Communication and Language Studies Programme, Institute of Communication and General Studies, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria

 

References

Ainy, E. N., Mayasari, L. Ro,fah, S. (2023). The Use of Turn-Taking Strategy between Introverted Students in English as Foreign Language (EFL). Wacana: Journal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra & Pengajaran, 21(2): 77-91.

Bremme, D. W., & Erickson, F. (1977). Relationships among verbal and nonverbal classroom behaviors. Theory into practice 16(3): 153-161.

Coulthard, M. (1977). An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman Group Limited.

Cullen, R. (2002). ‘Supportive teacher talk: The importance of the move’. In English Language Teaching Today, Journal 56(2): 117–127.

Hellermann, I. (2003). Classroom Interactive Practices for Developing L2 Literacy: A Microethnographic Study of Two Beginning Adult Learners of English. Applied Linguistics 27: 377-404.

Supakorn, S. (2020). A Conversation Analytic Study of Classroom Interactional Competence, LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal 13(2): 15-40.

Lee, Y. (2007). ‘Third Turn Position in Teacher Talk: Contingency and the Work of Teaching’. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 180-206.

Macbeth, D. (1992). Classroom “floors”: Material organisations as a course of affairs. Qualitative Sociology, 15(2): 123-150.

Markee, N. (2000). Conversation Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606471

Mahwah, N. J., McCarthy, E. (1991). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge. University Press.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons: Social Organization in a Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mehan, H. (1982). Children In and Out of School. In: P. Gilmore & A. Glatthorn (Eds.), Ethnography and Education. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Nassaji, H. and Wells, G. (2000). ‘An Investigation of Teacher–Student Interaction’. Applied Linguistics 21: 376–406.

Olateju, M. (2004). Discourse Analysis: Analyzing Discourse in the English as a Second Language Classroom. Lagos: Crossland Educational Services.

Payne, G. C. F. and Hustler, D. (1980). ‘Teaching the Class: The Practical Management of a Cohort’. British Journal of Sociology of Education 1(1): 49-66.

Spruit, A. M, M. C. Dekker, T. B. Ziermans, and H. Swaab (2019). ‘Educating Parents to Improve parent-child interactions: Fostering the development of attentional control and executive functioning. Journal of Educational Psychology 1: 158-175.

Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse. ‘The English Used by Teachers and Pupils’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (2005). Negotiating of Meaning in the English as a Foreign Language Classroom Interaction. Dosen S. I Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP, Universitas Timor.

Singleton, A. and Newman, K. (2009). ‘Empowering Students to Think Deeply, Discuss Engaging and Writing Definitively in the University Classroom’. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 20(2): 247-250.

Vanderstraeten, R. (2021). How does Education Function. European Educational Research Journal 20(6): 729-739.

Walsh, S. (2002). ‘Construction or Obstruction: Teacher Talk and Learner Involvement in the EFL Classroom’. Language Teaching Research 6: 3-23.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-13

Issue

Section

Articles