FUNCTIONAL PERSPECTIVE TO PLURILINGUAL COMMUNICATION IN HETEROGENEOUS SPEECH COMMUNITIES

Authors

  • K. G. ADEOSUN
  • O. K. OPALEYE
  • OLUSOLA ADETUTU

Keywords:

communicative competence, functional linguistics, language user, speech community, survival

Abstract

Prescriptive linguistic theories have viewed communicative competence for multilinguals as attainable separately in the different languages they use. However, plurilingualism – an emerging, 21st-century concept in communication studies – views communication in multilingual communities as a means, not an end. The functional method, as opposed to the earlier prescriptive methods, employed in this essay, views communicative competence, not as a goal to be achieved but as a process to be involved in. It was discovered that it is not necessarily so-called competencies in individual languages that aids the inclusion and survival of multilinguals in their heterogeneous speech communities. Rather, it is the continuous, deliberate and mixed use of multiple languages in various communicative events. This essay concluded that this communicative competence is, therefore, not per se attainable as a stop but only as a process. It was also recommended that language users trying to survive in plurilingual speech communities should be involved in active and continuous conversations across the different, available languages.

 

 

 

Author Biographies

K. G. ADEOSUN

Department of Communication and General Studies, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta.

 

O. K. OPALEYE

Department of Communication and General Studies, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta.

 

OLUSOLA ADETUTU

Department of General Studies, D.S. Adegbenro ICT Polytechnic,Itori,Ogun State.

 

References

Bialystok, E. 2017. The Bilingual Adaptation: How Minds Accommodate Experience. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), pp.233-262. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000099

Boldyrev, N.N. Dubrovskaya, O.G. 2019. Challenges of Intercultural Communication from the Perspective of Linguistic Interpretation Theory. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 4, pp.20-27. DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2019-4-20-27

Canagarajah, S. 2009. The Plurilingual Tradition and the English Language in South Asia. AILA Review, 22, 5-22. DOI: 10.1075/aila.22.02can

Canagarajah, A.S. Wurr, A.J. 2011. Multilingual Communication and Language Acquisition: New Research Directions. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 11(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/201971049/canagarajah-wurr-2011

Carnie, A. 2007. Syntax: A Generative Introduction (2nd ed.). Malden, USA: Blackwell.

Chiu, W. Lu, K. 2016. Paradigmatic Relations and Syntagmatic Relations: How are they related? Proceedings of the Association of Information, Science and Technology, 52(1), pp.1-4. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2015.1450520100122

Cross, R., D’warte, J., Slaughter, Y. 2022. Plurilingualism and Language and Literacy Education. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 45, pp.341-357. DOI: 10.1007/s44020-022-00023-1

Danbolt, L.D. 2011. The Challenge of Bilingualism in a Multilingual Society: The Bolivian Case. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 27. https://immi.se/oldwebsite/nr27/drange-27.htm

Grover, V.L. 2022. From Monolingual Mindset to Plurilingual Ethos: Challenging Perspectives on Language(s). Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44(8), n.p. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2023.2196983

Hasan, R. 2014. Towards a Paradigmatic Description of Context: Systems, Metafunctions, and Semantics. Functional linguistics 2014, 1:9. https://functionallinguistics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40554-014-0009-y

Hasan, R. 2009. The Place of Context in a Systemic Functional Model. Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics, pp.166-189. London, England: Continuum.

Halliday, M.A.K. 2002. An Introduction to Functional Linguistics (3rd edition). London, England: Edward Arnold.

Hopp, H. 2022. Early Plurilingual ForeignLanguage Teaching in Mixed Classrooms: Linguistic and Metalinguistic Predictors of Foreign Language Development among Majority-Language and Minority-Language Students in EFL Classes. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2022.102828

Jha, H. 2016. Implications of Sociolinguistic Variants in the Minority Speech Community. International Journal of Innovations in TESOL and Applied Linguistics (2017), 2(2). Retrieved from http://www.ijital.org/images/issues/IJITAL%204th%20Issue/Sociolinguistic%20variants%20and%20their%20implications%20in%20the%20minority%20speech%20community.pdf

Khubchandani, L.M. 1999. Speech as an Ongoing Activity: Comparing Bhartrhati and Wittgenstein. Indian Philosophical Quarterly, 25(1), 1-17. Retrieved from https://philpapers.org/rec/KHUSAA&grqid=b9O4DfRr&s=1&hl=en-NG

Linares, S.M. & Zhi-Ying, X. 2020. Language Education and Systemic Functional Linguistics: A state-of-the-art review. NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Learning, 11(2), pp.234-249. DOI: 10.15642/NOBEL.2020.11.2.234-249

Louf, T., Sanchez, D. & Ramasco, J.J. 2021. Capturing the Diversity of Multilingual Societies. Physical Review Research, 3(4), pp.1-11. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043146

Lopez, C.C. & Gonzales-Davies, M. 2015. Switching Codes in the Plurilingual Classroom. ET Journal, 70(1), pp.67-77. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccv056

Milburn, T. 2004. Speech Community: Reflections Upon Communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 28(1), 411-441. DOI: 10.1080/23808985.2004.11679041

Ploog, K. 2008. Subversion of Language Structure in Heterogeneous Speech Communities: The Work of Discourse and the Part of Contact. Journal of Language Contact, Brill Online Book and Journals edition 2008, 2, 1-26. DOI: 10.1163/000000008792525200

Rabiah, S. 2012. Language as a Tool for Communication and Cultural Reality Discloser. 1st International Conference on Media, Communication and Culture: Rethinking Multiculturalism: Media in Multicultural Society” organised by Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta and Universiti Sains Malaysia on November 7-8, 2012. Indonesia: Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

Saville-Troike, M. 1982. The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Schmitz, J.R. 2012. “To ELF or not to ELF?” (English as a Lingua Franca): That’s the Question for Applied Linguistics in a Globalized World. Belo Horizonte, 12(2), 249-284.DOI: 10.1590/S198463982012000200003

Silverstein, M. 2014. How Language Communities Intersect: Is “Superdiversity” an Incremental or Transformative Condition? Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies. DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2014.10.015

Tour, E. 2023. Bringing Plurilingual Strategies into Linguistically Diverse Classrooms: Affordances of Digital Multimodal Composing. Language and Education. DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2023.2203124

Wen-Cheng, W., Chien-Hung, L. & Ying-Chien, C. 2011. Cultural Diversity and Information and Communication Impacts on Language Learning. International Education Studies, 4(2). DOI: 10.5539/ies.v4n2p11

Downloads

Published

2024-03-28

Issue

Section

Articles