EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT NITROGEN SOURCES AND VARYING ORGANIC FERTILIZER RATES ON THE PERFORMANCE OF MAIZE (Zea mays l.) IN EKITI STATE, SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51406/jagse.v9i1.978Keywords:
Maize yield, N sources, organic fertilizerAbstract
A two – year field experiment was conducted at the Teaching and Research Farm of the University of Ado - Ekiti, Nigeria, during the 2006 and 2007 cropping seasons to appraise the influence of different N – sources, organic fertilizer rates, and the interactions between these two factors on growth and yield indices of maize (Zea mays L.). The design was a split – plot, laid out in a randomized complete block, with three replicates. N sources constituted the main – plot treatment, namely: control, urea, calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN), and NPK 15-15-15. Organic fertilizer rates constituted the sub – plot treatment, which were: 0 (control), 2, 4, 6, and 8 t ha-1. The results indicated that there were significant differences (p≤ 0.05) between the treatments in growth and yield parameters of maize. The two – year average values indicated that N - sources significantly increased maize leaf area from 0.52 m2/plant for control to 0.74, 0.91 and 1.04 m2/plant for urea, CAN, and NPK, respectively. Similarly, organic fertilizer rates significantly increased maize leaf area from 0.48 m2/plant for 0 (control) to 0.66, 0.79, 0.93 and 1.09 m2/plant for 2, 4, 6, and 8t ha-1, respectively. N – sources significantly increased maize grain yield from 1.94 t ha-1 for control to 3.78, 5.27, and 6.47 t ha-1 for urea, CAN and NPK, respectively. Similarly, increase in organic fertilizer rates resulted in a significant increase in maize grain yield from 1.67t ha-1 for 0 (control) to 2.03, 2.50, 3.06 and 3.72t ha-1 for 2, 4, 6, and 8t ha-1, respectively. The interactions between N sources and organic fertilizer rates significantly increased growth and yield components of maize. The treatment combination of NPK fertilizer and 8 t ha-1 organic fertilizer resulted in the highest values of growth and yield components of maize in both years.
References
Alabi, B.M. 2005. Comparative effects of organic wastes as a source of plant nutrients on growth and yield of maize. Journal of Applied Sciences. 2: 84 – 89.
Avery, D.T. 1995. Saving the planet with pesticides and plastics. The environmental triumph of high – yielding farming. Hudson Institute, Indianapolis. 44 pp.
Bai, B.N.S. 2007. The role of organic manure in maintaining soil fertility under continuous maize cultivation. Soil Fertility Research. 6: 224 – 229.
Bouyoucos, G.J. 1951: A recalibration of the hydrometer method of mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal. 43: 434 – 438.
De Ridder, N., Van Keulen 1990. Some aspects of the role of organic matter in sustainable intensified arable farming systems in the West African semi – arid tropics. Fertilizer Research. 26: 29 – 31.
Fondufe, E.Y. 1995. Assessment of different fertilizer models for application under different cropping systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. 282 pp.
Gazel, F.R.E. 2005. The role of organic wastes and plant residues in maintaining soil fertility under continuous cultivation. Advanced Journal of Soil Science. 18: 666 – 671.
Kantey, B.F. 2007. Effects of different sources of nitrogen on growth and yield of maize interplanted with melon. Plant Nutrition. 12: 204 – 209.
Kurtz, B.R.A. 2004. Urea in root and tuber crops production. Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition Research, 20: 681 – 687.
Kurtz, C.O. 2004. The influence of organic manure on growth and yield components of maize in South Asia. Crop Science Research. 20(8): 421 – 426.
Mclean, E.O. 1965. Aluminium. In: C. A. Black (ed.). Methods of soil analysis. Agronomy No 9 Part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. P. 978 – 998.
Mehra, P.O. 2007. Influence of tillage methods and different N sources on growth and yield of maize. Field Crops Research. 3: 81 – 86.
Nyathi, P.B.M. Campbell 1995. The effects of tree litter, manure, inorganic fertilizer, and their combinations on above – ground production and grain yield of maize. African Crop Science Journal. 3(4): 451 – 456.
Orallo, B.B. 2006. Effects of organic fertilizer and increasing planting density on the performance of maize. Fertilizer Research. 3: 30 – 35.
Osaki, M., Sshirai, J., Shinamo, T., Tadano, T. 1995. Effects of ammonium and nitrate assimilation on the growth and tuber swelling of potato plants. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 41: 709 – 719.
Powell, D.T. 2005. Effects of nitrogen sources and goat manure on growth and yield of maize. Soil and Plant Science. 16: 811 – 816.
Risse, V.O. 2004. Comparative effects of different N sources on major soil nutrients and yield of maize. Advanced Journal of Soil Science. 11: 503 – 508.
Rodale, R. 1995. Your farm is worth more than ever. Put your farm’s internal resources to work. New Farm Magazine Regenerative Agriculture. 8 pp.
SAS, K.M. 2006. Effects of different N sources on growth and yield of sweet potato in the tropics. Fertilizer and Soil Fertility Research. 6: 321 – 326.
Saxena, M.C., Singh, Y 1965. A note on leaf area estimation of intact maize leaves. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 10: 437 – 439.
Soil Survey Staff (SSS) 2002. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, SMSS Tech.
Monograph (8th edition). Natural Resource Conservation Services, USDA.
Tankou, J.F. 2004. The role of organic and inorganic fertilizers in soil fertility maintenance and crop production. Soil Science Research. 16: 300 – 305.
Turkey, A.A.I. 2007. Influence of goat manure and NPK fertilization on yield and yield components of sweet corn. Journal of Crop Science Research. 22: 251 – 256.
Usor, R.O. 2005. The role of organic fertilizers in maintaining soil organic matter status in the tropics. Soil Organic Matter Research. 12: 606 – 611.
